FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Critics say Michigan foreclosure bills seek to 'get people out of their homes quicker'





MLive

All Michigan



Critics say Michigan foreclosure bills seek to 'get people out of their homes quicker'


Jonathan Oosting | joosting@mlive.com By Jonathan Oosting | joosting@mlive.com
Follow on Twitter
on May 24, 2013 at 8:40 AM, updated May 24, 2013 at 9:06 AM







foreclosure-genericjpg-bb797e18a55e03da_large.jpg 
 
 
 
LANSING, MI -- Michigan homeowners could have more time to avoid foreclosure but less time to reverse it under legislation moving quickly through the state legislature.

The Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee on Thursday approved a four-bill package, introduced one day earlier by a group of Republican lawmakers, that would extend a pre-foreclosure negotiation period allowing residents to seek loan modifications but shorten a post-foreclosure redemption window allowing them to retain or short sell their homes.

The bills now head to the full Senate for consideration.

Supporters say a quick fix is needed because the state's mandated negotiation period is set to expire at the end of June, but critics believe reducing the redemption period could result in more Michigan residents losing their homes and damaging their credit as the state continues to emerge from a prolonged foreclosure crisis.

"This is so inconsistent and going in the wrong direction of federal policies, where the concern is to do everything you can to keep homeowners in their homes," Lorray Brown, a statewide foreclosure specialist with the Michigan Advocacy Project, said in testimony before the committee on Thursday. "And here we are in Michigan, trying to get people out of their homes quicker."
Senate Bills 380-382, sponsored by Sens. Randy Richardville of Monroe, Mike Nofs of Battle Creek and Jim Marleau of Lake Orion, would extend the state's 90-day negotiation period, which is set to expire at the end of June, through January 10. That's when new federal regulations kick in mandating a 120-day period, which would allow additional time for homeowners to seek loan modifications or other agreements with their lender in an attempt to avoid foreclosure.

Senate Bill 383, sponsored by Sen. Darwin Booher of Evart, would shorten Michigan's post-foreclosure redemption period by 120 days -- from six months to two months -- providing residents with less time to pursue a short sale or reclaim their home by paying off outstanding fees after it is placed in foreclosure and sold at a sheriff's auction.

While the foreclosure crisis hit Michigan early and hard, numbers are now trending in the right direction. The state saw fewer than half as many foreclosures in March of 2013 than it did in March of 2012. Still, Michigan totaled roughly 70,000 foreclosures during that 12-month period, more than all but two other states.

Booher, who chairs the committee and worked in Michigan banks before entering politics, said the proposal is appropriate because the state's foreclosure rate is slowing, and with federal regulations mandating a longer negotiation period, it makes sense to shorten the redemption period. All told, he pointed out the entire process -- from a missed mortgage payment to loss of a home -- could still take more than 200 days to complete.

"I believe this is the right time and the right policy for Michigan," Booher said. "I believe that this really isn't a shortening of the foreclosure process, but rather a shift in our time frame."

The bills are tie-barred together, meaning that none will take effect unless all four are approved by the legislature and signed by the governor, frustrating some who would support the pre-foreclosure provisions but strongly oppose the shortened redemption period.

"This is really a sad situation," Neeta Delaney, head of the Michigan Foreclosure Task Force, told MLive earlier Thursday. "It was a very political, strategic move on the part of the legislators who are pushing it. It's frustrating to tie those three bills to something else that is so drastic."

Booher said it is important to move quickly on the bills because state law mandating the 90-day negotiation period expires in June but the federal regulations do not take effect until early January. Michigan lawmakers are expected to begin their summer break on June 13, he said, meaning the bills would have to move through both chambers in the next few weeks.
Michigan banks and credit unions widely support the package, pointing to the wide scope of pending federal regulations and their own pro-active efforts to work with borrowers.

"We have little to no redemptions during the redemption period," said Kieran Marion, vice president of governmental affairs for the Michigan Credit Union League. "We have very little people taking advantage of the 90-day process on the front end. We do a lot of work with our borrowers to try to keep them in their homes, and that's probably a result of that."

Local lenders aren't the problem, according to Democratic Sen. Jim Ananich of Flint, who said that Michigan banks and credit unions are generally willing to work with owners to keep them in their homes.

"My problem is with the bigger folks that it's impossible to get on the phone," said Ananich, who cast the lone "no" vote against SB 383. "When I had a Bank of America loan -- I was trying to pay if off, I wasn't even in the foreclosure process -- it took me three weeks to get someone on the phone.

"I feel like we're dealing with folks that are doing the right thing, and we're letting off the folks that are hurting a lot of citizens across the state and across the country."

Booher, pointing to his own experience in the profession, said banks that do everything right during the pre-foreclosure negotiation period, which would be extended to 120 days, should not be "penalized" by having to wait another six months to take possession of a property after they have foreclosed. During that window, he argued, some residents neglect or damage homes they are not intending to fight for.

"People tear up those homes," he said. "They destroy it, or somebody does. Whether or not they've left the home, those buildings are being destroyed and causing the value of my property to go down. So that additional 120 days, I've got to be convinced is worth having on the end of this during the foreclosure process."

But shortening the redemption period would do little to deter outgoing homeowners intent on defacing their property, according to Brown, who said other states have taken a more direct approach by allowing banks to take possession of a home, with a court order, if it is significantly damaged during the foreclosure process.

"If someone's inclined to destroy the property, they'll do as much as they can in two months," she said. "So we have to look at what is the most effective policy to address that issue. That's not done with a blanket reduction of the redemption period."

Underwater homeowners are increasingly using the redemption period to negotiate a short sale, which requires lender approval to sell their home for less than they owe on the mortgage. Banks lose money in the process, while the homeowners avoid significant damage to their credit and a neighborhood can be spared a vacant home.

Short sales can often take six months to complete, according to Kathy Persha, a real-estate agent in Metro Detroit who specializes in helping homeowners facing foreclosures. She said that reducing the redemption period to only two months would prohibit some residents from being able to find a buyer and get lender approval to sell their home once it enters foreclosure.

"It's a joke," she said. "With some of the new rules that came out last October, we thought the process would happen a lot quicker. Instead, everyone I've talked to in this business have all said the same thing: the time frame has gotten much longer for short sales. And some banks would rather not approve short sales and just take the property back."

Michigan Senate Bills 380-383 now head to the full Senate for consideration. Booher said he plans to meet with interested and concerned parties in hopes of fine-tuning the legislation in coming weeks.

Jonathan Oosting is a Capitol reporter for MLive Media Group. Email him, find him on Google+ or follow him on Twitter.

Monday, May 27, 2013

This Week in Poverty: Homeowners Take the Foreclosure Fight to the DOJ







Greg Kaufmann
Poverty in America: people, politics and policy.



Protesters mobilize at Freedom Plaza. Credit: Greg Kaufmann.


Gisele Mata of Whittier, California, never considered herself a political activist. Other than making some calls on behalf of President Obama during the 2012 campaign, her focus was on her work, family, church and volunteering as a Girl Scout troop leader.

But on Monday morning at Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC, she was ready to march to the Department of Justice, where she would risk arrest in order to save her family’s home and stand up for other people facing foreclosure.

“Banks are doing extreme things to get people out of their homes, so it requires extreme action,” Mata told me. “I wouldn’t be here except the banks are not being monitored so we have to stand up as citizens. They are getting away with acts of inhuman behavior and the Justice Department is not reacting.”

Mata was among 500 activists from across the country who came to the nation’s capital to “Bring Justice to Justice”—participating in three days of action organized by Home Defenders League and Occupy Our Homes. They were calling for the criminal prosecution of banks for ongoing illegal activity, including illegal foreclosures; and for resetting mortgages to a property’s fair market value for the more than 13 million homeowners still at risk of foreclosure.

Mata and her family have been in their home for more than ten years. Their struggle began in 2009 when she and her husband were laid off from their jobs in retail and engineering, respectively. They survived by cashing out on their 401(k)s and working in low-wage jobs.

“We didn’t have any problems until last year,” she said, when they no longer could afford both their home and food for their family of five. So Mata and her husband requested a mortgage modification from Bank of America.

“We asked them to tack on what we owed to the principal, and to give us the going interest rate because we still have a high rate,” she said. “We aren’t even asking for a principal reduction. Plus we’re both working, we have equity in our home—but they still refuse.”

Her eldest daughter is now working as a massage therapist. Her husband is again employed as an aircraft parts quality inspector—for $13 an hour, compared to the $19 hourly wage he previously earned—and Mata earns commissions as a sales representative for an energy company. But the high interest payments they are paying force them to choose between a roof over their head or food for the family.

“Right now we’re choosing the roof and getting food from our church in order to make payments on the mortgage,” she said. “And we go to the 99 cent store and buy Top Ramen [noodles] and tuna fish. That’s pretty much how we make it.”
But even as the Matas continue to make their payments, Bank of America continues to push for foreclosure. Her dealings with the bank in an effort to get a modification tell a story that is now all too familiar in this country.
“Negotiating means paperwork multiple times over and over again,” she said. “As soon as you get it in they switch your point-of-contact and then you have to start over again. And as many times as they ask is how many times you do it, or else they won’t consider you for the modification. No one is holding them accountable.”

Ann Haines of St. Paul, Minnesota, was also ready to get arrested after experiencing an even more extreme nightmare in dealing with US Bank. She had lived in her home with her three sons for thirteen years, and was struggling to meet a monthly mortgage payment that had risen from $800 to $1300.
“I work in intake at a methadone program,” she said. “I see people at their lowest and my nature is to help. So I was foolishly thinking that by asking the bank for help I would get it.”

Instead, what she got was US Bank telling her to stop making payments for three months so she would be eligible for a modification, followed by the bank sending her the wrong modification application. She then arrived home one day to find her locks changed and a realtor going out her back door. The bank proceeded with a sheriff’s sale.

“It was terrifying and you don’t know what to do,” said Haines.

Legal Aid was able to stop the sale of her home, since the bank admitted it had sent her the wrong modification application and foreclosed while she was still in underwriting—a process known as “dual tracking.” (This is now barred under the California Homeowners’ Bill of Rights and the just-passed Minnesota Homeowners’ Bill of Rights.)

“But what really inspired me to fight was the attorney for US Bank sitting across from me in court and saying, ‘The only negotiation US Bank is willing to do right now is to get her out,’ ” said Haines. “He didn’t have enough courage to look at me, but he said it.”


Haines hooked up with Occupy Homes MN and traveled last month to the US Bank shareholders meeting in Boise, Idaho, to confront CEO Richard Davis.
“Two days later the eviction case was magically closed,” said Haines.
She described herself as “elated” that she no longer fears losing her home at any moment. But she still felt the need to be in Washington, DC, to support other struggling homeowners.

“I don’t want to be arrested, jail is scary for me,” she said. “But I’m willing to do it to show that this is serious. There are too many people going through this, and the banks have to be held accountable. If I did something wrong they would hold me accountable.”

Cammy Dupuy of Gonzales, Louisiana, isn’t affiliated with any particular group—she had learned about the action in recent weeks on the Internet. She was also prepared for arrest, though not particularly looking forward to it.
“I’m really nervous and scared to go to jail,” said Dupuy. “But if that’s what it takes to let people know they’re not alone—the shame shouldn’t be put on people.”

Since 2006, Dupuy’s mortgage has had so many different banks and loan servicers attached to it that the trail is dizzying. As a result, she has had her paperwork lost as servicers change, not been provided new mailing addresses for payments, fought off two sheriff’s sales and even received modification “offers” that would have had her paying double-digit interest rates and waiving her right to sue for the mishandling of her note.

Throughout her struggle, Dupuy has found herself alone.

“The thing about Louisiana, nobody talks about foreclosures, and they don’t put signs out in people’s yards like in other states, so they really keep it from the public,” she said. “But I’ve been pulling up the sales on my local sheriff’s website and every month there are quite a bit just in my parish alone.”
Dupuy said a lot of people are “just walking away because they don’t know what to do.”

“I’m tired of feeling alone. I want people in Louisiana to start talking about it, start standing up, start doing something,” said Dupuy. “The people in Louisiana fear the law. But if all of us come together and take a stand then fear shouldn’t be a problem.”

By the end of the day on Monday, Mata was arrested on the steps of the Department of Justice along with sixteen other nonviolent activists. (The nonviolence by activists didn’t translate to nonviolent arrests by Homeland Security officers, who used tasers.) The demonstrators had set up an encampment and also blocked traffic along a very busy Constitution Avenue. Mata and others didn’t give their names when booked—they didn’t want this to be just another routine booking and quick release—so she was held until Tuesday evening.

“I told them I was [Bank of America CEO] Brian Moynihan,” said Mata, and many of the other demonstrators who were arrested used the names of bank CEOs as well.

Dupuy was arrested along with six other homeowners Wednesday morning while blocking the lobby entrance to Covington & Burling—a prominent international law firm that has represented JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, UBS and other major banks. Haines was one of the demonstrators blocking the entrance too, but because she was on the outside of the building, police just removed her from the space.

In addition to representing the large banks, organizers said the law firm epitomizes the “revolving door” between serving government and serving Wall Street’s interests, noting that Attorney General Eric Holder was a partner at Covington & Burling before coming to the DOJ, and former Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer left his post in March to become vice chair of the firm.
For three straight days, these homeowners and their supporters—mostly low-income people of color—demonstrated what it means to personally sacrifice for the good of others, to move beyond hopeful words to deeds and actions.
I hope that those of us who seek change feel their urgency, and will follow their lead to take more and greater action—together.
Victories in Minnesota: Progressive Budget and Homeowners Bill of Rights
According to Carol Nieters, executive director of SEIU Local 284, in 1971, Minnesota Governor Wendell Anderson called education equity—poor school districts that were struggling—and high property taxes “the issue of our time.”
The state legislature responded by creating a “general education levy” that equalized and created dedicated funding for schools, and also lowered property taxes.

“It went forward like that for like the next four decades,” said Nieters. “It put Minnesota in a place to be a premier state in education.”

But then along came Governor Jesse “The Body” Ventura who body-slammed the levy, and Governor Tim Pawlenty who presided over nearly a decade of disinvestment from schools and taking from school appropriations to plug other holes in the budget.

“As a result, we’ve now got ten or eleven four-day school districts, and other than core curriculum, everything else is cut out—arts, music, in some cases languages,” said Nieters.

But this week the state reaffirmed its commitment to education. At a time when so many states are opting to close schools that primarily serve low-income students, Minnesota passed a budget that closes corporate tax loopholes and increases education funding and equity.

The 2013 budget erases the state’s $627 million budget deficit, raises the income tax by 2 percent on the wealthiest 2 percent of Minnesotans, raises $424 million by closing corporate tax loopholes and reduces property taxes by $400 million.
The budget uses new revenues to make key investments in education, including: fully funding optional, all-day kindergarten; increasing special education funding by $236 million; and importantly, passing two levies that will make funding for all school districts more reliable, while also providing additional resources to local districts with the greatest need.

“This budget gets to equity in education and reduces property taxes,” said Nieters. “Over four decades later we are doing the same thing we did right in 1971.”

She said the budget was achieved by the union and its progressive allies reaching out to groups all across the state that were pursuing a “common interest of stronger communities [through] an educated society and workforce.” They began organizing prior to the 2012 election with a message that wealthy individuals and corporations must pay their fair share in order to strengthen education. Many Democrats ran on that platform, and the party picked up enough seats to win majorities in both the House and Senate.

After the election, the grassroots coalition kept the pressure on the newly elected legislators to follow through on their commitments. In the last few months alone, there were thousands of calls, visits, letters and e-mails to representatives, and a “Students’ Day” for parents and children at the Capitol, with students from kindergarten through high school attending.

The budget was passed Monday night by the legislature, and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton signed it into law yesterday.

“We engaged organizations all over the state—and we can make a difference if we do that,” said Nieters. “The voice of the people can be heard over the folks with the money. But you gotta get out there.”

* * *

On Sunday, the Minnesota House of Representatives passed the Homeowners’ Bill of Rights by a bipartisan 123-0 vote. The Senate passed a companion bill last week, so now it just awaits Governor Dayton’s signature.

The bill protects homeowners through a number of provisions, including: requiring loan servicers to offer modifications to all eligible homeowners; banning “dual tracking,” which occurs when a bank forecloses on a homeowner before communicating a decision on a loan modification application; and allowing homeowners to take the servicer to court to stop foreclosure if the servicer fails to comply with any aspect of the Homeowners’ Bill of Rights. (Also important, lawyer’s fees and court costs would be covered if the homeowner proves his or her case.)

Ann Haines, the homeowner from St. Paul interviewed in the DOJ story above, testified along with other homeowners at a House hearing on the bill in January.
Democrats and the Farm Bill
I always expect the worst from the House Republicans when it comes to SNAP (food stamps) and the Farm Bill. So while much attention and anger has been focused on the $20.5 billion cut proposed by the House Agriculture Committee—which would take food stamps away from nearly 2 million people and result in several hundred thousand low-income children no longer receiving free school meals—my reaction was more along the lines of… yeah, what did you expect?
I was actually more disturbed that the Democratic Senate Agriculture Committee would vote for a $4.1 billion cut in food stamps—even though the average benefit is about $1.46 per person, per meal, and a recent Institute of Medicine report demonstrates that benefit levels are already too low to stave off hunger. The cut “would mean $90 less a month for 500,000 families already struggling to make ends meet,” according to Joel Berg, executive director of the New York City Coalition Against Hunger. Berg noted that an amendment by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand would have prevented the SNAP cuts “by instead cutting subsidies for crop insurance companies, many of which are foreign owned.”

Unfortunately, the committee failed to pass Senator Gillibrand’s amendment, and Senate Democrats proved yet again that the party’s commitment to those who are the most economically vulnerable is about as thin as Republican cut proposals are deep.

But the party outdid itself on Wednesday when the Farm Bill was debated on the Senate floor. As Center on Budget and Policy Priorities president Robert Greenstein describes:
Senator David Vitter offered—and Senate Democrats accepted—an amendment that would increase hardship and will likely have strongly racially discriminatory effects. [It] would bar from SNAP, for life, anyone who was ever convicted of one of a specified list of violent crimes at any time—even if they committed the crime decades ago in their youth and have served their sentence, paid their debt to society, and been a good citizen ever since…. The amendment would [also] mean lower SNAP benefits for their children and other family members. So, a young man who was convicted of a single crime at age 19 who then reforms and is now elderly, poor, and raising grandchildren would be thrown off SNAP, and his grandchildren’s benefits would be cut…. Senator Vitter hawked his amendment as one to prevent murderers and rapists from getting food stamps. Democrats accepted it without trying to modify it to address its most ill-considered aspects.
Antipoverty advocates suggest contacting your senators—particularly Harry Reid, Debbie Stabenow and Richard Durbin—to tell them that you oppose this provision. They suggest doing it as soon as possible since it’s unclear how quickly the Farm Bill will move.

You might also suggest to them that the party check Lost and Found for its spine, too.
But at Least We Have Congresswoman Barbara Lee
Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer introduced the Half-in-Ten Act of 2013, which would establish the Federal Interagency Working Group on Reducing Poverty. The working group would develop and implement a national strategy to reduce poverty by half in ten years, integrating federal policies on poverty reduction, and also provide regular progress reports to Congress.

“Our policies and programs addressing poverty have not kept pace with the growing needs of millions of Americans,” said Congresswoman Lee, who chairs the new Democratic Whip Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity and consistently represents the interests of low-income Americans. “It is time we make the commitment to confront poverty head-on, create pathways out of poverty and provide opportunities for all.”

I would imagine this bill has about as much a shot at passing the House as this blog has at becoming Speaker Boehner’s favorite bedtime reading. Nevertheless, I’m always thankful for Representative Lee—I’m glad the Democratic whip is supporting her efforts—and it’s always worthwhile to keep up with her work and listen to what she has to say.
And That Goes for Senator Bernie Sanders, Too
Senator Bernie Sanders, chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, introduced legislation yesterday to reauthorize and strengthen the Older Americans Act, which supports Meals on Wheels and other critical programs for seniors such as in-home care, transportation, benefits access, caregiver support, chronic disease self-management, job training and placement and elder abuse prevention.

“With 10,000 Americans turning 65 every day, our country’s growing population of seniors includes many who rely on these critical programs to help them stay in their own homes and communities,” said Sanders, speaking at an Older Americans Summit.

Funding has not kept pace with the growth in need or numbers, and recent cuts before the sequester hit have further eroded investments in key services.
In a letter endorsing Senator Sanders’s bill, National Council on Aging president and CEO James Firman writes that the legislation “can empower seniors and improve their health and economic security, bend downward the long-term entitlements cost curve, and promote greater program efficiency and coordination.”

The bill would also require the Bureau of Labor Statistics to create a consumer price index for the elderly that would account for spending on high-inflation goods and services like healthcare, prescription drugs and heating homes.
Get Involved
Wendy’s: Join the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ Fair Food Program
Hold Sallie Mae accountable for its role in the student debt crisis
Protect Federal Nutrition Programs and SNAP in the Farm Bill
12 Things You Can Do to Fight Poverty
Events

A Bold Approach to the Jobs Emergency (Tuesday, June 4, 8:30 am – 4 pm, 20 F Street NW Conference Center, Washington, DC) We have a US jobs emergency. More than 11 million Americans are still out of work, and the austerity push is only making matters worse. States have been forced to implement deep cuts to emergency unemployment benefits even though almost 40 percent of the unemployed have been jobless for more than six months. Great panels—with great people—on how to create good jobs and raise labor standards. Among the participants: Dean Baker, Maya Wiley, Ellen Bravo, Sarah Bloom Raskin, Nona Willis Aronowitz, Dorian Warren, Annette Bernhardt, Ai-Jen Poo, Gar Alperovitz, Joseph Geevarghese, Madeline Janis and Deepak Bhargava. Presented by the Roosevelt Institute. Register here.

2013 Mississippi on the Potomac Reception (Tuesday, June 4, 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm, AFL-CIO, 815 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC) The event marks the tenth anniversary of the Mississippi Center for Justice, a not-for-profit public interest legal organization that works against the odds to provide legal assistance to some of the most vulnerable and neglected communities in Mississippi, the poorest state in the country. For more information about the reception, contact Lauren Welford at 601-709-0859 or lwelford@mscenterforjustice.org, or click here to sponsor the event or purchase individual tickets.
Clips and other resources (compiled with James Cersonsky)
Why I Am Fasting to Keep Families Together,” Gabriela Abendano
Improving How Domestic Workers and Their Employers Settle Disputes,” Sheila Bapat
SNAP Rolls: They’re Elevated for a Reason,” Jared Bernstein
What You Should Know About the Philly Student Walkout,” James Cersonsky
Farmworkers Fight Wendy’s, the ‘Last Holdout’ on Fair Food,” Michelle Chen
Top Democrats React to Low-Wage Federal Workers’ Strike,” Mike Elk
One Community’s Effort to Take Back its Schools,” Equal Voice News
Ongoing Joblessness in Michigan,” Mary Gable and Douglas Hall
U.S. Retailers See Big Risk in Safety Plan for Factories in Bangladesh,” Steven Greenhouse
Senator Vitter Offers—and Senate Democrats Accept—Stunning Amendment With Racially Tinged Impacts,” Robert Greenstein
Poverty Flees to the Suburbs,” Josh Harkinson
Young College Graduates: Economic Implications of Unpaid Internships,” Will Kimball
‘Obamaphones’: A Case Study in How Race Perverts the Spending Debate,” Jamilah King
No Head Start for Jacob,” Yannet Lathrop
Though Enrolling More Poor Students, 2-Year Colleges Get Less of Federal Pie,” David Leonhardt
Poverty up 20 percent among N.J. children 5 and younger, report says,” Susan K. Livio
Family Cap Rule Punishes California Kids,” Ashley Morris
Why I Am Moved to End Domestic and All Types of Violence,” Marcia Olivo
A Long Cold Summer For Young People Looking For Work,” Isaiah J. Poole
Unions Make the Middle Class,” Andrew Satter, Lauren Santa Cruz, and Karla Walter [VIDEO]
Doing away with food deserts in the District,” Michael Shank
Report: Job training rule for food stamps would trim rolls by half,” Jason Stein
Studies/Briefs (summaries written by James Cersonsky)

A State-by-State Snapshot of Poverty Among Seniors,” Zachary Levinson, Anthony Damico, Juliette Cubanski and Patricia Neuman. Kaiser Family Foundation. The Census Bureau’s standard poverty measure is based on food costs, family size and age of family members. A more recent, supplemental measure covers a range of other poverty-related factors, including homeowner status, regional differences in housing prices, tax credits, in-kind benefits and expenses ranging from income taxes to healthcare. For seniors, half of whom spent at least 16 percent of income on healthcare in 2009, this last factor is critical. Under the supplemental measure, this report finds, the senior poverty rate is higher in every state, at least twice as high in twelve states and roughly 20 percent in six states (California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Georgia and New York). Nationally, the senior poverty rate is 15 percent under the supplemental measure, compared to 9 percent under the official measure. For incomes below 200 percent of the poverty level, the percentage of seniors increases from 34 to 48 percent under the supplemental measure. These findings, the authors say, weigh critically on Medicare and Social Security policy.

The Economic Security Scorecard: Policy and Security in the States,” Wider Opportunity for Women. What constitutes economic security? This report hones in on twenty state-level policy areas covering eighty-five policies: income and job standards, including minimum wages, state earned income tax credits, paid sick leave and unemployment insurance; saving and asset policies, including college savings and retirement plans; supports including childcare assistance, medical assistance and property tax relief; and education and workforce training policy. The report evaluates states according to their performance in each of these areas. Washington is the only state that receives higher than a C grade (B-), followed by Vermont and Oregon (C+). Scoring D+, Mississippi, Alabama and Utah anchor the bottom of the rankings. The report finds that a state’s budget size, median income and overall fiscal health are not strongly related to its economic security score. It finds a stronger relationship between education levels and security; among the top five states, an average of 35.1 percent of residents have a bachelor’s degree, compared to 24.1 percent for the bottom five. Overall, it finds, most states fall short on job quality standards.

The Wall Street Wrecking Ball: What Foreclosures Are Costing Us and Why We Need to Reset Seattle Mortgages,” United Black Clergy and Washington Community Action Network. Across the country, and particularly among people of color, homeowners are still feeling the aftershock of the financial crisis. This report shines a spotlight on Seattle. A staggering 33.5 percent of Seattle homeowners, 42,411 in total, are underwater on their mortgages. Between 2008 and 2012, 16,515 homes were foreclosed on. The report estimates that if banks reset these underwater mortgages to fair market value, homeowners would save an average of $9,253 annually, pumping $392 million into the local economy and helping to create 5,800 jobs.
Vital Statistics
US poverty (less than $17,916 for a family of three): 46.2 million people, 15.1 percent.

Children in poverty: 16.1 million, 22 percent of all children, including 39 percent of African-American children and 34 percent of Latino children. Poorest age group in country.

Deep poverty (less than $11,510 for a family of four): 20.4 million people, 1 in 15 Americans, including more than 15 million women and children.

People who would have been in poverty if not for Social Security, 2011: 67.6 million (program kept 21.4 million people out of poverty).

People in the US experiencing poverty by age 65: roughly half.

Gender gap, 2011: Women 34 percent more likely to be poor than men.

Gender gap, 2010: Women 29 percent more likely to be poor than men.

Twice the poverty level (less than $46,042 for a family of four): 106 million people, more than 1 in 3 Americans.

Jobs in the US paying less than $34,000 a year: 50 percent.

Jobs in the US paying below the poverty line for a family of four, less than $23,000 annually: 25 percent.

Poverty-level wages, 2011: 28 percent of workers.

Percentage of individuals and family members in poverty who either worked or lived with a working family member, 2011: 57 percent.

Families receiving cash assistance, 1996: 68 for every 100 families living in poverty.

Families receiving cash assistance, 2010: 27 for every 100 families living in poverty.

Impact of public policy, 2010: without government assistance, poverty would have been twice as high—nearly 30 percent of population.

Percentage of entitlement benefits going to elderly, disabled, or working households: over 90 percent.

Number of homeless children in US public schools: 1,065,794.

Annual cost of child poverty nationwide: $550 billion.

Federal expenditures on home ownership mortgage deductions, 2012: $131 billion.

Federal funding for low-income housing assistance programs, 2012: less than $50 billion.
Quote of the Week
“The banks are throwing families out into the streets with no regard and no one is holding them accountable.”
       —Gisele Mata, California homeowner, arrested at the Department of Justice
James Cersonsky wrote the “Studies/Briefs” and co-wrote the “Clips and other resources” sections in this blog.

This Week in Poverty posts here on Friday mornings, and again at Moyers & Company. You can e-mail me at WeekInPoverty@me.com and follow me on Twitter.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Man Who Paid His Mortgage Early Facing Foreclosure





Man Who Paid His Mortgage Early Facing Foreclosure


Etienne Syldor (Credit: WFTV)


Etienne Syldor, an Orlando resident who works as a bus driver at Walt Disney World, says that Wells Fargo has started foreclosing on his house. This is despite the fact that he not only made his payments on time, but even overpaid on them.

As local station WFTV reported, “Last year, Wells Fargo offered him mortgage modification, and he was told if he made four monthly payments during a trial period, the modification would be permanent.” Court records show that he went beyond making the payments on time to pay early and more than was required. At times he says he has worked multiple jobs to make sure he can make mortgage payments.

But Wells Fargo recently stopped taking his payments and sent him a letter telling him that it was starting foreclosure proceedings.

Banks have been accused of similar shenanigans in the past, as many have lost track of paperwork, illegally foreclosed on military members, and refused to work with borrowers who scrounge up money on modifications. Major banks have been widely reported to use a process known as “dual tracking” in which they work with a borrower on a modification while also pursuing foreclosure. Some instructed borrowers to stop making payments to help enter the modification process only to foreclose on them anyway.

But banks were ordered to end dual tracking and other abusive practices as part of the $25 billion fraud settlement. They dragged their feet on ending this practice as homeowners continued to face foreclosure. Banks were also ordered to modify mortgages as part of the settlement but some have been slow to dole out the relief.

Frustration about the weak agreement, coupled with the slow trickle of settlement money, sparked a protest at the Department of Justice on Monday, where activists and foreclosed homeowners marched and some were arrested.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Cleveland: Ground zero for the housing bubble


SALON




Cleveland: Ground zero for the housing bubble

The housing crisis that helped tank the economy started here. As usual, America paid no attention to the Midwest 

 




Cleveland: Ground zero for the housing bubble 
Slavic Village, Cleveland, Monday, Jan. 14, 2008. (Credit: AP/Tony Dejak)
 
If houses go to heaven, then Classen Avenue, in the Cleveland neighborhood of Slavic Village, has been the scene of a mass Rapture. Ted Michols watched it all happen. A retired trade magazine editor, a bachelor, a man who likes to sit on his porch and share the neighborhood with passersby he’s known fifty years, Michols has lived his entire life in a little square house his grandfather bought in 1923. It was the kind of house that used to be good enough for everyone in Cleveland: 800 square feet of domesticity in the middle of a pond of grass where a Virgin Mary is flanked by floral suns of marigolds, and an American flag. He shared it with his brother, another bachelor who died in 2005. Now he’s alone.

His old school friends want to know why he never followed them to the suburbs. To them, Slavic Village is the Old Neighborhood, but no longer the neighborhood they grew up in. “It’s changed,” they say delicately. That’s Cleveland code for, “the element moved in,” which in turn is code for “black.”

Michols stayed because Slavic Village is Polish—unlike many urban neighborhoods, where integration is the period between the arrival of the first black and the departure of the last white, Slavic Village only changed halfway. At Seven Roses, the cabbage and pierogi buffet on Fleet Avenue, the newspapers and lunchtime gossip are about doings in Krakow and Warszawa. And staying in Slavic Village meant staying in the parish of Immaculate Heart of Mary, where he had been baptized.

“The one good thing about living here is you have a lot of friends,” Michols said. “We were working on the sidewalk, about 10 people stopped and talked. You don’t get that in the suburbs. People don’t talk.”

But he had fewer friends than before the housing crisis. The house next door disappeared first. The couple who lived there had paid $17,500 for it, in 1977. At that price, they should have been sheltered for life, but “they liked to buy stuff,” Michols observed, so they borrowed and borrowed against their equity until, in 2004, they lost it to the bank. A fireman picked it up for $25,000. Like a slumlord, he painted it and rented to a woman on Section 8, who was so clueless about housekeeping that Michols had to mow her lawn. From owner to low-income renter, the house was moving down in the world. Eventually, a corner of the foundation collapsed, causing the floor to sink four inches. The tenant moved out, and the house was demolished, leaving in the grass only the outline of its basement. The same thing happened across the street, where an absentee landlord bought out an owner, and rented to tenants who sold drugs. After they set the house on fire, Michols went to court to have the place demolished.

Frugality was easy for Michols. Having inherited his house, he’d never made a mortgage payment. Having no children to educate, he never thought of borrowing. So he was astonished by the appliance repairman who divorced his wife and abandoned his house, owing $83,000. And by the speculators who were paying double what the old-line neighbors knew the properties were worth.
“Sometimes, we’d look at some of those homes and we said, ‘This is going for $86,000? What is going on.’ The bank wasn’t looking at applications.”

As the loans went bad, and the houses emptied, the scrappers arrived, tearing out furnaces, aluminum siding and water pipes right in broad daylight. To discourage scavengers, signs reading THIS HOUSE DOES NOT HAVE COPPER PLUMBING were posted in windows. But Classen Avenue became such a magnet for thieves they even broke into occupied houses. A kid from down the street tried to burgle Michols, but Michols chased him off. Only a neighbor who mowed the vacant lots prevented Classen Avenue from reverting to pre-settlement prairie.

Clevelanders have a saying: “Cleveland’s pain, the nation’s gain.” It means, “A lot of shitty stuff happens here, but we hope the rest of America can learn from our misfortune and avoid the same crap.” The foreclosure crisis that would drag the American economy into its deepest slough since the Great Depression arrived first in Cleveland, and nowhere was it more severe than Slavic Village. The 44105 zip code, which covers southeast Cleveland, was the scene of more housing speculation than any place in the country. Unfortunately, the rest of America wasn’t paying attention.

Slavic Village was settled in the late 19th century by Poles, Czechs and Bohemians who’d been imported to break a strike by native-born workers at the Cleveland Rolling Mill. They worked ten hours a day, six days a week, for wages that kept them just a bit more comfortable than barnyard animals, and built $400 cottages with even smaller mother-in-law cabins out back. Slavic Village was sooty, it was overcrowded, but it was also one of those self-contained ethnic ghettoes that perpetuated Old World languages and customs for decades after babeia and diadziek arrived on the ship from Danzig. The church where you were baptized, the department store where you bought your communion dress, the high school where you finished your education, the factory where you spent your working life, the tavern where you spent your afterwork life, the house where you raised your family, the hospital where you died, and the graveyard where you were buried were all within a few miles of each other. Unto the third generation, children grew up speaking Slavic languages at home, hearing them during Mass at St. Stanislaus (Polish) or St. John Nepomucene (Czech) and arguing in them at the Alliance of Poles, the Czech Sokol Center or the Bohemian National Hall. The storefronts on Fleet Avenue and Broadway were labeled with poorly-emvoweled names: Stepke’s Hot Shop, Glinka’s Tavern, Divorky Hardware. Nobody minded a small house, because the tavern, the church and the social hall were extensions of the living room.

That all changed after World War II, of course. Slavic Village’s children moved to inner-ring suburbs such as Garfield Heights and Parma. (Parma is Cleveland’s Cleveland, the butt of local jokes about pink flamingos and bathtub Madonnas. The Drew Carey Show’s original theme was “Moon over Parma” and in 2010, a radio host spoofed Jay-Z’s “Empire State of Mind” with “Parma State of Mind.”) The suburbanites returned for polka bands and pierogi-eating contests at Slavic Village Fest, but when their parents died, the middle-aged offspring had no interest in their childhood homes. They sold out to absentee landlords, who rented to Section 8 tenants. By the 1990s, Slavic Village, which had never actually been a village, was no longer entirely Slavic either. It was more than 50 percent African-American. After the slumlords came the speculators, the house-flippers. Ohio had some of the weakest lending laws in the nation. Slavic Village, a neighborhood full of unwanted dwellings, was ground zero for exploitation.
Between 2000 and 2010, Slavic Village’s population dropped 27 percent, on its way down from its all-time high of 70,000 to 20,000. During a time when banks were willing to write mortgages to anyone, for any amount of money, there was cash to be squeezed out of empty houses. Here’s how one scam worked, according to Tony Zajac, an aide to Slavic Village’s city councilman, Anthony Brancatelli. When Zajac’s aunt was 89, her son moved her into a nursing home. He put a “PRIVATE SALE” sign on her 10-room house, offering it for $40,000. The buyer took out a $90,000 mortgage, stating on the purchase agreement that she intended to use the balance for rehab. Instead, she split the money with the mortgage broker and the appraiser who had conspired to falsify the home’s value.

“They took the $50,000 and split it to line their pockets with gold,” Zajac said. “Three years ago, Aunt Mary and her son were sued by the lender, Deutsche Bank. They falsify the income of the purchaser and they fly. They leave the house once they got the money.”

Then there were flippers. They paid old women $40,000 for their houses, then turned around and sold them for $60,000 to suckers whose greed was inflamed by “Get Rich Quick in Real Estate!” infomercials, and by the inflated real estate market of the late 1990s, when properties were doubling and tripling in value. Hapless bargain hunters purchased houses on the Internet, only to find them boarded up and stripped of every metal fixture. A California artist looking for a cheap home/studio bought a Slavic Village house that turned out to be condemned. (After many trips to housing court, he brought it back up to code.)
The lenders were so aggressive they went door to door on the East Side of Cleveland, pointing out loose shingles, collapsing chimneys, or sagging porches. Money from a second mortgage could repair any of those defects, the door-to-door brokers told the homeowners. They never mentioned the adjustable rate.

Anita Gardner’s sons fell for that scam. Gardner, who worked 31 years as a heavy duty machinist and welder at TRW, bought a two-story house on the East Side for $21,000 back in the early 1970s. It was almost paid off when she was diagnosed with Chiari malformation, a brain disorder that left her too ill to work, or even walk up the stairs to her bedroom. So she bought a one-story home, a converted liquor store, and signed the old house—“My Buckingham Palace, a place where I could cover the walls with my paintings and close off the world”—over to her two thirty-something sons. When Gardner had moved in, every house was owned by an autoworker or a steelworker with a wife, four or five children, and a new car. Then J+L Steel, the neighborhood’s largest employer, closed in 1999. The blue-collar workers moved out, and the mortgage brokers began moving in, attracted by the remaining residents’ financial desperation. Having lost their paychecks, these dispossessed factory rats were told they still had a source of income, in the houses they’d bought cheap and paid off with union wages and frugality.

“This couldn’t have happened if people had good jobs,” Gardner said. “Or why would they change their mortgage? They were desperate for money. It was targeted. It was definitely targeted. Mortgage agents were going door to door, calling on the phone. It was in the air: ‘You don’t have to have credit. You can have nice things.’”

Gardner’s sons fell for the pitch. Neither had ever been able to afford nice things. The elder brother had served 11 years on a drug charge. When he got out of prison, the only job he could find was delivering furniture for Sears. The younger brother was a restaurant supply salesman. When an agent from Countrywide Financial agent offered them a $70,000 mortgage on their mom’s almost-paid-off house, they signed. Gardner suspects the agent falsely inflated the home’s value in order to write a bigger mortgage. Agents received bigger commissions for adjustable-rate mortgages. The boys used the second mortgage for a shopping spree. A black Hyundai Tiburon sports car. A new couch. A big screen TV. A refrigerator in the garage, full of beer.

The monthly payments began at $436 a month, but as the boys missed payments, it more than doubled to $950, far more than they could pay on their small-time jobs. When the past due amount reached $4,000, Gardner’s sons appealed to mom for a bailout.

Gardner paid the arrears, plus an $800 transaction fee, plus a series of six $1,000 “good faith payments” to return the note to its original payment plan. A realtor friend negotiated with Countrywide to buy the house back for $25,000 — which Gardner raised by borrowing on her new house. The mortgage lending crisis ate up her life savings.

“I’m out of money,” she said. “This is all my retirement money. I have enough to live on, but all the money I had stuffed under the mattress, it’s gone. Meanwhile, my mortgage on the new house jumps from $600 to $900.”

Gardner evicted her sons—“they don’t deserve this, they don’t understand what the palace is”—but two months after buying back her house from Countrywide, she was informed that the employee with whom she’d negotiated had no authority to cut a deal.

“Why should we take $25,000 when we can get $70,000?” a Countrywide agent told Gardner. “We will get the money from your son. We will prosecute him.”
Countrywide sued Gardner’s sons, and began foreclosure proceedings on the house. Desperate, she appealed to an organization called ESOP—Empowering and Strengthening Ohio’s People. As a social service agency in the nation’s foreclosure capital, ESOP was devoting a large part of its resources to mortgage counseling. Having lived a middle-class life, Gardner was a little put off by ESOP’s office. A room in the back of a church, with two or three people working on mismatched furniture, it reminded her of a sweatshop or a numbers runner’s den. But Gardner joined ESOP’s campaign against Countrywide, which had been writing shady mortgages all over northeastern Ohio. Wearing a shark’s head, Gardner joined a picket of Countrywide’s headquarters, where ESOP members passed out the personal cell phone number of CEO Angelo Mozilo.
Busloads of protestors picketed Marzullo’s country club. (They were followed, needless to say, by vanloads of TV cameras). ESOP blew up the company’s fax machine with photographs of foreclosed homes. Finally, Countrywide settled with Gardner for another $6,000. Buckingham Palace was hers again, but the rest of her street was a cemetery.

“There was seventy-six houses on the street, and now only eleven are occupied,” she said.

This raises a question. Which is the greater social ill: allowing people who can no longer afford their mortgages to stay in their houses, thus undermining the credit system by letting people to skip out on their payments, or evicting people from houses for which there is no buyer, thus undermining the property itself, and the surrounding neighborhood? Ted Michols and Anita Gardner would say let the poor folks stay and look after their houses. Vacant houses attract criminals. Michols called the cops on a stripper trying to tear the aluminum drainpipe off a house at 11 o’clock in the morning. In a 150-foot radius around a vacant house, property values go down at least $7,000. A vacant house reduces its own value even more, since it’s usually denuded of plumbing fixtures, boilers, carpeting, sinks, toilets, heating pipes and any architectural sconces that can be peddled in a second-hand shop. Yellow foreclosure stickers and plywood windows are not warnings, they’re invitations. After homeowners exhaust the equity, inner-city scavengers salvage the last pennies of value out of a house, until the mortgage lender ends up paying the city for demolition.

Jim Rokakis, who had been a 22-year-old city councilman when Dennis Kucinich was mayor, was elected Cuyahoga County Treasurer in 1996. Holding that job, at that time, made him the first politician in America to see the foreclosure crisis coming. Normally, 2 to 3 percent of the county’s homes were in foreclosure. But by the end of Rokakis’s first term, that proportion had doubled. Cuyahoga County had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation.

As a freshman treasurer, Rokakis was ignorant of the mortgage industry’s scams. But once he learned that fly-by-night brokers were writing inflated mortgages to buyers with no income, he convened a conference on “Predatory Lending in Ohio” at the Cleveland branch of the Federal Reserve. Rokakis hoped that Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan might crack down on sleazy lenders like Countrywide. Greenspan did nothing, not even after receiving a warning letter from a federal reserve governor who attended the conference. So Rokakis persuaded three Ohio cities—Cleveland, Dayton and Toledo—to adopt anti-predatory lending ordinances. The ordinances were quickly invalidated by the state legislature in Columbus, which passed a law specifying that only the state could regulate banking. This, of course, lured even more lenders to Cleveland. In 2004, Ameriquest Mortgage Company, the nation’s largest subprime lender, established an office of its Argent Mortgage subsidiary in Cleveland. Ameriquest had invented the “stated income loan”: if a customer told Ameriquest he earned 100 grand a year, Ameriquest would take his word for it. Why let the facts mess up a bad loan?

“The amazing statistic about Argent is their first year of operation, ’04, they led Cuyahoga County in two categories—loans issued and foreclosures,” Rokakis said. “So the day they opened up, they were in trouble. They were making these wild loans and they were making loans that could not be repaid.”

By the time the crisis peaked, in 2006, Cuyahoga County had 13,000 foreclosure filings—four times its pre-2000 level. Unable to get the attention of Greenspan or Ohio Gov. Bob Taft, Rokakis wrote an Op-Ed for The Washington Post. By then, it was too late for the nation to gain from Cleveland’s pain. From its cradle in Slavic Village, the sub-prime lending industry had spread throughout the entire nation, and was a year away from capsizing the entire American economy. Wrote Rokakis:
“Let me tell you about a place called Slavic Village and the death of a girl called Cookie Thomas. You’ve never heard this story before—talk of housing markets and hedge funds, interest rates and the Federal Reserve has drowned it out.
Twenty years ago, the Slavic Village neighborhood of Cleveland was a tightly knit community of first- and second-generation Polish and Czech immigrants. Today, it’s in danger of becoming a ghost town, largely because a swarm of speculators, real estate agents, mortgage brokers and lenders saw an opportunity to make a buck there.
You could say it was because of them that 12-year-old Asteve “Cookie” Thomas lost her life on Sept. 1, shot in Slavic Village when she stumbled into the crossfire of suspected drug dealers. The neighborhood wasn’t always a haven for criminals—not until hundreds of foreclosures destabilized the community. Houses (800 at last count) and then entire streets were abandoned. Crime increased as vacant properties offered shelter for people who had a reason to hide.
Cookie Thomas… haunt[s] me because [she] didn’t have to die. In a sense, [her death] was foreshadowed in the late 1990s, when the dark side of the real estate industry—the predatory lenders—came to Ohio, including Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, where I serve as treasurer They knew that the state’s lax regulatory structure would give them virtually free rein. This is when we first heard terms such as “securitization,” “mortgage-backed securities,” “3-28s,” and “risk modeling.” These are code words for Wall Street strategies that made the cycle of no-money-down, no-questions-asked lending possible—the strategies that have sucked the life out of my city.”
By 2006, the year the crisis peaked in Cleveland, 903 of Slavic Village’s 2,944 properties were in foreclosure. Rokakis did secure passage of a county ordinance that sped up foreclosure of vacant, tax-delinquent properties. The empty houses went into the city’s land bank, which often sold them to next-door neighbors, so they could expand their yards. (“If the vacant lot is next to you and you can beautify it by putting grass and cutting it and keep it nice, it adds to your property value,” Rokakis said.) Others went to community development organizations. On a street as gapped and rotten as an old tramp’s mouth, a group called Slavic Village Development built vinyl-sided ranch houses to replace the worn-out workingman’s cottages.

Slavic Village offers an opportunity for an entrepreneurial developer. Broadway, the neighborhood’s high street, is served by five-and-ten dollar businesses: Walgreen’s, Wendy’s, soft ice cream stands, and grimy diners serving city chicken. (The Cleveland dish of city chicken is actually cubed pork on a skewer. It was invented as a poultry substitute by Slavic housewives too poor to afford actual chicken, and is still served as a white ethnic comfort food.) What Slavic Village needs is a strip mall gathering every ghetto business under a single roof. It would include a cell phone store, a discount dollar store, a Rent-to-Own center, a Laundromat, a liquor store specializing in White Owl cigars and Night Train wine, a Chinese take-out with three wobbly tables, and a hand-lettered “NO MSG” sign in the window, a chicken-and-fish grill where the food is served on a rotisserie that rotates through a bulletproof window, an Instant Tax Refund Center where a man dressed as the Statue of Liberty hands out flyers every winter, and a Currency Exchange charging a 3% fee to cash checks for people trying to avoid having their bank accounts garnished for child support and/or back taxes and/or legal fees. The mall could also support a sneaker boutique selling counterfeit Nikes (look for the backward swoosh) and three-for-five packages of cotton socks; as well as a day labor center that takes a 33% fee out of your wages, but doesn’t ask “Have you ever been convicted of a felony?” on the application. A pawn shop is also a possibility, although pawnbrokers have been thriving since the recession began, so they might be able to afford their own building.

The wonderful thing about this mall is that it could be pre-fabricated and franchised out to every inner-city neighborhood and small town in the United States. Just as toothpaste and soap manufacturers are trying to profit from the economic stratification of America by developing discount products for the formerly middle class, a single poverty-pimpin’ conglomerate—we’ll call it PoorMart—could develop thousands of these little malls, from Bridgeport, Conn., to Phoenix City, Ala., to Stockton, Calif. After buying the properties in foreclosure sales, PoorMart would hire non-union contractors to build the stores, and recruit low-wage employees from Pakistan, India, Nigeria and Iraq, arranging for work visas which would be voided at the first sign of insubordination. PoorMart would fill a niche too small and specialized for Walmart to occupy. As the Walton family earns billions of dollars by selling shoddy goods to people who lack the money or the transportation options to shop in department stores, PoorMart’s owners would earn billions off people to poor to shop at Walmart. They’d earn make billions more in interest and convenience fees from people too broke to save up for a living room set, or wait six weeks for their tax refunds. With its combination of retail stores and financial services, PoorMart would transmutation the masses’ poverty into investors’ wealth.

As the birthplace of the New Underclass, Slavic Village is the perfect test market for PoorMart. Unlike most urban neighborhoods—even most neighborhoods in Cleveland, where the Cuyahoga River separates East Side blacks and West Side whites—Slavic Village is racially mixed. A cross was burned when blacks began to infiltrate in the 1990s, but Catholic parishes—like Ted Michols’s Immaculate Heart of Mary—and Polish immigrants prevented unanimous white flight. Slavic Village’s demographics have settled at 55 percent African-American and 41 percent Caucasian. The white population has actually been growing, due to young urban pioneers seeking cheap housing and “authentic urban experiences” (i.e., Polish bakeries) they can’t find in the suburbs. When Slavic Village Development built middle-income houses and townhouses on the site of a closed-down state mental institution, it managed to attract black and white buyers in equal numbers, by marketing to both races. Councilman Brancatelli marketed his 4th of July fireworks show the same way: he hires a country singer and a funk band, thus drawing a salt-and-pepper crowd of blacks, elderly Poles, and tattooed white families. While waiting in line for free ice cream and hot dogs before the fireworks, I met a man who identified himself as “Bohemian, Hungarian, Polish, Czech and Slovenian,” which used to pass for diversity in Slavic Village. He believed his neighborhood’s worst years were over, now that the city was demolishing the legacies of the foreclosures.

“It’s cleaned up a lot of property,” he said. “There’s a lot of vacant land. The crime went up, because there was drug dealers in all the houses, but they’ve been torn down. It’s turning the corner. Plus, once you’re a drug dealer, you have to have money to buy drugs. All the scrap is gone. The drug dealers are moving out to the suburbs.”

* * *

The housing crisis that began in Slavic Village eventually bankrupted several Wall Street houses that had overinvested in subprime mortgage-backed securities. What was bad for Wall Street was even worse for Detroit. The American automakers were already struggling in 2008. Their solvency depended on SUV sales. Only big vehicles could generate the profits necessary to pay health care premiums and pensions for millions of retirees. But once gasoline prices crested at $4 a gallon that May, even Americans stopped buying SUVs. In the spring quarter of 2008, General Motors lost $15.5 billion. GM cut off medical benefits to retired salesmen, engineers, and executives, but it couldn’t cut off UAW members, whose contracts guaranteed health care for life.

Then, in September, Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy. The stock market lost 30 percent of its value. Automobile sales dropped by the same amount, to their lowest levels since the Iranian crisis of the late 1970s. GM stock crashed to $3.36 a share—less than a third of its value just three months before, and its most meager price since 1946. Drivers weren’t buying cars. Bankers weren’t making loans. The auto companies had only one place to turn for money: the federal government.

In Pinckney, Michigan, an automotive engineer named Tom Lavey watched the entire congressional auto bailout hearings on CNN. Lavey had plenty of time to sit in front of his television, because he’d just been laid off for the second time that year. During the spring, he’d ended a contract job with International Automotive Components, designing carpets for Ford cars. In the fall, Lavey caught on as a contractor with Ford, where he had worked early in his career. It paid a third less than he’d been making at IAC, but in 2008, the Big Three weren’t handing out engineering jobs, the way they had been when Lavey graduated from Eastern Michigan University in the 1980s.

There’s a saying that when a boy is born in Southeastern Michigan, his parents declare “What a cute baby. He’ll make a great addition to the auto industry.” Lavey decided that himself. From the time he was seven years old, he wanted to make cars. His path was confirmed in college, where he saw a flyer listing the salaries of various careers. “Manufacturing and Auto Industry: $30,000 a year” it read. That was good money. It was security, too. How could manufacturing ever go away? People would always need stuff. The auto industry had supported his grandfather, who’d spent his entire career at Ford’s, and it would support him, too. Right out of college, Lavey got a contract job at Ford, and saved enough money for a three-month trip to Europe.

“From 1989 to 2008, it was fat in this town,” he said. “you’d get a contract, have two parts to work on.”

Throughout the 2000s, though, Lavey saw signs that his dream career was not as secure as he’d imagined. There were fewer designers on each job, which mean the surviving engineers often had to stay in the office until eight or nine o’clock. And the auto companies were outsourcing computer assisted drafting to India and the Philippines. The draftsmen were cheaper, but a pain to work with. You couldn’t talk to them face to face. Because they were on the opposite side of the world, bad designs took an entire day to fix.

Still, Lavey wasn’t prepared for the brevity of his last assignment for Ford. The job lasted exactly a month before it was eliminated during the financial crisis.
“Don’t worry,” Lavey’s supervisor told him. “This is a budget thing. We’ll have you back in January.”

Two weeks later, the boss called back, with more bad news.

“Guess what?” he told Lavey. “They got me, too.”

When the chairmen of General Motors and Chrysler traveled to Washington to beg for a loan (first by corporate jet, then by caravan, after congressmen criticized the mendicant auto executives for flying when it have would been cheaper to drive), the strongest opposition came from Southerners who saw burying Detroit as an opportunity to bury the United Auto Workers and the entire union movement. Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama called the American auto industry a “dinosaur,” and suggested government aid would only delay its well-deserved demise.

“Companies fail every day and others take their place,” Shelby said. “I think this is a road we should not go down.”

The companies that would have taken GM’s place—Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, and Honda—all have plants in Alabama, where they benefit from Southern hostility to organized labor. None of Alabama’s plants are unionized—perhaps one reason the state ranks 46th in household income.

Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, who represented a Volkswagen and a Nissan plant (as well as GM’s unionized Saturn facility in Spring Hill), tried to force the UAW to agree to “wage parity” with the Japanese auto plants as a condition of the bailout. His attempt to cut union wages to non-union levels was mooted when President George W. Bush decided that, like the banks, the auto companies were too big to fail, and sent them $17.4 billion of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout money, enough to keep them afloat for three months.

Bush was one of Detroit’s few friends in Washington during that difficult autumn. Even as Two of the Big Three wheedled with the Senate Banking Committee, the House Energy and Commerce Committee unhorsed Rep. John Dingell of Michigan as its chairman, replacing him with Henry Waxman of California. It was a clash between liberalism’s most powerful wings—coastal progressives and Rust Belt union brothers—and it was unfortunate, because between them, the two have a solution for saving the auto industry.

If one congressman had forever seen that universal healthcare could be a boon to American manufacturing, it was Dingell. Rooted in the New Deal and the Industrial Heartland, Dingell embodied the auto industry’s traditions. Stocky, block-headed, with safety-glass eyewear, he looked like he should have been inspecting the paint job on a Buick. Every year since beginning his record-setting service in Congress, in 1955, Dingell had introduced a bill for a single-payer national health insurance system—the same bill his father began promoting in 1933.

By 2008, though, the political tide had turned against the old Detroit champion. Dingell’s defense of the auto industry made him a stalwart opponent of any regulations that might discourage GM from building ginormous SUVs. He had tried to prevent California from adopting its own auto emissions standards, arguing for a nationwide plan. Waxman, a resident of Beverly Hills, he was more concerned with air quality in his overpopulated state than with the plight of Midwestern factory workers. The 82-year-old Dingell left the meeting at which he lost his chairmanship on crutches, demonstrating both the infirmity of his state and the industry he has defended so vigorously.

Waxman and Dingell both needed to realize that health care, environmentalism and the labor movement are inseparable elements of saving the auto industry. Unfortunately, the Affordable Care Act that Waxman would help pass did not relieve the burden of health care costs on automakers. GM had already tried to do that on its own. During a two-day strike in 2007, the company negotiated an agreement to transfer retiree healthcare to an independent trust fund, maintained by the UAW. GM contributed $36 billion to the fund—70 percent of its liability to retirees. It was expected to save the company $2.5 billion a year.

* * *

The $17 billion bailout did not provide a new job for Tom Lavey. Americans still weren’t buying cars. They had no equity left in their houses, and since new housing starts had crashed from 2 million a year to 500,000, hordes of construction workers were without jobs. Out of work for the first time in his adult life, Lavey joined the “99ers”—the hard-luck Americans eligible for 99 weeks of unemployment. As a bachelor, he had no family to support, but he was nonetheless grateful when his landlord cut the rent in half. He could have paid the full freight with his unemployment check, but that would have meant eating a lot of meals at his mother’s house. Lavey kept busy in his machine shop, where he made screws, nuts and binocular housings, selling them to a science supply company for just enough money to cover his cell phone bill and fill his gas tank.
“Working in a shop, I got laid off for a week at a time,” Lavey said. “But this was the first time I was told, ‘Get out and don’t come back.’”

He wouldn’t be invited back in for almost two years.

* * *

When Nick Waun came home to Michigan after a tour of duty in Iraq, he intended to finish his economics degree at the University of Michigan-Flint. But first, he needed a job to pay for school. Waun was a fourth-generation factory brat—his great-grandfather had been a Sit-Down Striker, and growing up, he’d listened to his father and grandfather talk shop. In 2007, it wasn’t easy to get a job in an auto plant, but Waun was a veteran. More importantly, he was a legacy. He had an in.

“Hey,” his aunt asked. “You want to go work for General Motors?”

(A family recommendation is pretty much the only way to get a job in an auto plant nowadays. The United Auto Workers may as well be a hereditary guild.)
Waun was hired to work on the line at the Lake Orion Assembly Plant, at $28 an hour, an astonishingly high wage for a 25-year old. He bought a house in Lapeer, a village in Michigan’s Thumb, a protuberance east of Flint whose anatomical nickname is derived from its resemblance to the loose digit on the mitten-shaped Lower Peninsula. At night, Waun built Pontiac G-6s and Chevy Malibus. During the day, he went to school in Flint.

Waun belonged to the final class of middle-income autoworkers. If he’d hired in even a few months later, he would have been offered half the money he was earning, and fewer benefits. In 2007, as part of the same national agreement in which the UAW took on retirees’ health care costs, the union also agreed that non-assembly workers could be paid $14 an hour. This arrangement became known as the tiered wage system. The veteran auto-workers were called Tier Ones, while the ill-paid new hires were Tier Twos. The UAW hoped Tier Twos would become Tier Ones as soon as the companies’ fortunes improved. The next year, of course, GM and Chrysler went bankrupt. As part of its pre-bankruptcy concessions, the union agreed to freeze Tier Two wages until 2015. During the bankruptcy restructuring, GM was forced to eliminate the Pontiac nameplate. (With Oldsmobile already dead, GM’s brand ladder had been reduced to three rungs: Chevrolet, Buick and Cadillac. Buick survived because it had become to Chinese party officials and software tycoons what the Mercedes-Benz is to Hollywood producers and Brooklyn rap stars: the car that says, ‘I’ve made it,’ or however they say ‘I’ve made it’ in Mandarin.) With Pontiac in the brand graveyard, Waun was laid off for a year while the Lake Orion plant was retooled to build Chevy Aveos. When he was called back, GM gave him a choice: he could stay in Lake Orion as a Tier Two, or he could continue earning $28 an hour at the plant in Lordstown, Ohio, 220 miles around the bend of Lake Erie. The reason: Lake Orion would be building the Aveo and the Chevy Cruze, compact cars that sold for less than $20,000. GM could only make a profit if 40 percent of the workers assembling those cars earned $14 an hour. Because of Waun’s low seniority, he would have to take a pay cut.

Waun took the transfer, which came with a $30,000 bonus. He dropped out of college 18 credits short of a degree, and rented a $450 a month trailer in a mobile home court across the turnpike from the plant. Lordstown was home to a lot of GM gypsies who’d been forced out of their home factories.

Even before he was jerked around by General Motors, Waun had been a rabble rouser. During his freshman year in college, he was a campus radical who thought a student should sit on the University of Michigan’s Board of Regents.
Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans would nominate him, so he ran on the Reform Party ticket. At 18, Waun was the youngest candidate ever to appear on a statewide ballot in Michigan—one-upping fellow Flintoid Michael Moore, who had only run for local office. As an autoworker, Waun labored in GM’s two most militant cities: Flint and Lordstown. The Lordstown plant had opened in 1966, and was immediately staffed with Viet Nam veterans, who were, as we saw in Decatur, Ill., the most uncompromising labor activists of the late 20th century. Lordstown built the Vega, Chevy’s crappy attempt to crash the small car market. The car was scheduled to debut in 1970, but that fall’s UAW strike delayed its introduction. The little Vega was supposed to be America’s greatest weapon against Japan since Little Boy. To rush the heavily-advertised car to dealers, GM doubled the speed of Lordstown’s assembly line. A “speed up” had caused the Sit-Down Strike. Lordstown’s workers responded by slashing upholstery, keying up paint jobs, denting quarter panels and even breaking off keys in locks. Finally, they went on strike. The estrangement of these young, multi-racial workers became known as the “blue-collar blues”; their rebellion was a “Worker’s Woodstock,” drawing comparisons to the anti-war matches at nearby Kent State University.

As a scion of both these Up the Company traditions, Waun began a campaign against the tiered wage system. It wasn’t just about economic fairness, although that was certainly part of it. Tiered wages were accomplishing what those Southern senators had tried to write into the auto bailout plan. Non-union, foreign-owned plants were now setting the pay scale for American autoworkers. Not only did Tier Twos earn half as much, they had lesser benefits, bigger co-pays for health care, and a 401k contribution, instead of a pension. If GM could threaten to cut Waun’s pay in half, whose livelihood was safe? There was also a quality issue. After a year at Lake Orion, Waun was named a team leader—just as the plant brought in a second shift, composed partly of Tier Twos. Tier Twos were not supposed to assemble cars. According to the agreement, that status was reserved for “non-core” jobs, away from the line. But GM was putting them on the line, and, unsurprisingly to Waun, they wouldn’t—or couldn’t—work as hard as Tier Ones. Some were juggling two jobs to pay their rent, and came to the plant exhausted. Others decided that $14 an hour was not enough money for the hectic pace of auto work. They walked out of the plant, declaring “I’m going back to Home Depot.” If a bolt wasn’t torqued right, they’d let it go down the line, rather than making the effort to tighten it. Such lax attitudes created tension with the Tier Ones. Waun saw a resentful Tier One punch his Tier Two team leader. When the Michiganders arrived at Lordstown, the lower-paid Ohioans refused to speak to them, then taunted them by wearing t-shirts popular on football Saturdays in Columbus: “Ann Arbor is a Whore”; “M Go Blow.”

“They’ve already had problems with the Cruze, with steering wheels coming off,” Waun said. “There’s been a couple recalls. I’ve heard it brought up at the union, that it was sabotage by disgruntled Tier Two workers.”
Waun filed a complaint against the Lake Orion agreement, on the grounds that it had been approved without a vote of the local membership. If his brothers and sisters had known about the Tier One/Tier Two clause, he was sure they would have turned it down.

“The membership had no previous knowledge that a 50% pay cut was under consideration until the announcement on October 3,” Waun wrote in his complaint. “For the previous 12 months, charging member Nick Waun had perused every local newsletter, attended every local meeting, and frequently reviewed the local website. Though negotiations with GM were reported on, there had been no indication that significant pay cuts might be an issue at the table.”

In a letter addressed to “Brother Waun,” UAW President Bob King replied that the International Executive Board had not only rejected Waun’s complaint, but that he had no standing to make a complaint, because he had transferred his local membership from Lake Orion’s 5960 to Lordstown’s 1112. Waun then appealed to the National Labor relations Board, which declined to intervene in “an internal Union matter.”

So Waun continued his campaign on the Internet. He became a regular poster on factoryrat.com and autoworkercaravan.org, two shoprat message boards. During a visit to Michigan, Waun participated in a demonstration against the two-tier system that was attended by one of the last surviving Sit-Downers. Bob King labeled him “the number one troublemaker in the UAW.”

As I found out when I visited his trailer in Lordstown, Waun had nothing better to do. Big and soft, with a shaved head and oblong, half-framed spectacles, Waun lived in conditions that identified him as a) the tidiest bachelor this side of a wedding; b) a mustered-out soldier who still abided by barrack-room standards of neatness, or c) a man who spends most of his nights in a place he refuses to call home. Probably all three. The only furniture in his living room was a folding card table, on which rested his computer and a copy of Overhaul, Auto Czar Steven Rattner’s self-congratulatory memoir of how he saved Detroit, despite spending only one day there and knowing far more about credit default swaps than internal combustion.

“I look at it like camping,” Waun said of his austere life. “I look at it like when I was in the Army. A lot of times we’d sleep in tents. A lot of times we’d sleep in trailers.”

Waun couldn’t travel because he’d burned all his time off visiting his aged parents in Michigan. Since his brother lives in Seattle, Waun is the closest, so he used up a month-and-half sick leave caring for his diabetic father. When his mother’s heater broke down, Waun took vacation time to fix it. He couldn’t sell his house, either, because it’s worth less than he paid for it. Nor could he finish his degree: the school where he earned 90 percent of his credits is in Michigan. Waun didn’t live where he worked. Nor did he work where he lived.  It was a familiar situation for a soldier, and it was becoming familiar for autoworkers too.

“We’ve had guys who’ve had nervous breakdowns,” he said. “They’re facing divorce. We’ve had three suicides. They just couldn’t face moving down here. A number of guys got into drugs. Now they’re in rehab.”

Waun took the transfer because had he stayed in Lake Orion, he would never again have earned $28 an hour. GM has promised to promote Tier Twos to Tier Ones, but given the economic structure of the auto industry—in which companies must pay grand retiree benefits while trying to make a profit on fuel-efficient cars—and the prevailing wages at non-union competitors, Waun believe the company is using the system to permanently reduce its labor costs.

“We’re trying to prevent it from becoming the future,” Waun said. “The Tier Two was sold to the membership in 2007 as a temporary fix to their problems. Now that they’re out of bankruptcy, the dog is dead, but the tail is still wagging.”
The tiered wage system was not just bad for the Tier Twos, he believed. It was bad for the UAW. The union is trying to organize Southern plants, but who needs a union that can’t get you any more money than you’re earning now? It was bad for all American workers, because the UAW “set a standard for wages in the industrial world, and industrial America. At $28.12 an hour, people can feed a family and buy a used car, buy a decent house and maintain a certain standard of living.” It was bad for GM, because the auto plants would only attract less skilled, less committed workers. “There are more minorities and women among the Tier Twos. A lot of the white males refused to work for the wage. They just quit.” And it was bad for the auto industry, because those workers would build cars as shoddy as any Vega that came out of Lordstown in the early ’70s. “People aren’t going to have a vested interest in the automobile. You’re going to end up with cars like my Aveo out there. After 50,000 miles, the rear axle came off and the odometer broke.”

I visited Waun late in the evening. It was his early morning, since he worked Third Shift, midnight to eight, at the building across the highway that was his only reason for leaving the trailer. Our interview ended as his clock-in time approached. Before I left, he gave me the phone number of a co-worker named Nadine, who had suffered even more from the tiered-wage system: she’d been forced to take a 40 percent pay cut.

Nadine was a plaintiff in Dragomier et al v. UAW, a lawsuit filed by a group of Lordstown autoworkers who had been busted down from Tier One to Tier Two. Nadine hired in at Lordstown in 2002. After over a dozen years of working for banks and law firms, she changed the color of her collar because she was tired of sitting in front of a computer for 15 hours a day. Building cars was an eight-hour job she could forget about when she went home. Hired as a temporary employee at 70 percent of the full-time rate, by 2008 she was earning $24.40 an hour. That June, a union representative called in thirty-five temporary employees, one at a time, and gave them all the same speech: “The company is finally going to make you permanent. The only thing is, you’re going to have to take a temporary pay cut. If you don’t, you’ll be out of the plant by September.”
When Nadine appealed to an official in the company’s labor-management department, the official told her, “Take it or leave it. You do this or you’ll be out of a job.”

Had Nadine turned down the offer, she would have been ineligible for unemployment. So she signed. Right away, her life went to hell, inside and outside the plant. As a single woman, Nadine had no one at home to share expenses. She cancelled her cable and her internet. That left her with just enough money to pay the mortgage.

“I am living like I’m on unemployment or welfare,” Nadine said bitterly. “I’m struggling to make my mortgage payments, to live. I’m losing $500 to $700 a week. I can’t afford to do anything. At work, it’s ‘Oh, what are you doing on shutdown? I’m going to Florida.’ ‘Oh great, I’m trying not to lose my house.’ I have nothing in common with people I work with. After I put gas in my car, pay late bills and late fees, I have $20 left to eat for a week and a half. I still owe money on a foot surgery from over two years ago. It’s devastated my life. I’ve lost friends over it. I’ve lost family over it. I can’t socialize.”

GM promised to raise Nadine’s pay when it added a third shift, but ended up filling those jobs with workers from Delphi Automotive, a parts supplier that had sold some of its operations to the company. Workers with less seniority were earning more money than Nadine, which “really raised my rage.” To add insult to poverty, Nadine was still working on the main assembly line, instead of the easier, non-assembly work supposed to be assigned to Tier Twos. Whenever she got off the turnpike at Lordstown, her dread of the upcoming shift generated “a horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach.” All night, as she installed brake boosters, Nadine reminded herself that her situation was not the car’s fault, or the customer’s fault. It was the only way to prevent her acid anger toward GM and the UAW from eroding her work ethic. Really, the only thing that kept her coming to the plant every day was the lawsuit against what she knew was an illegal contract. If she quit, she would lose her standing as an advocate for all the Tier Twos at all the GM plants.

“The only reason I’m still there,” she said, “is that I know it’s easier to fight this battle from the inside.”
* * *
Tom Lavey finally went back to work in the spring of 2010, designing floor mats for Ford. He was a contractor, meaning his company badge was piped with a green stripe, rather than the blue stripe that identified full-time employees.
“I’m making more money than I did before the layoff, but it’s not secure,” he said. “Even if they give you a blue stripe, it’s not secure. A lot of people don’t trust the car industry anymore. A lot of engineers left to go to Indiana to work at Navistar. I’ve got a five-year-old car, and I’m going to drive it into the ground. I’m check to check. That’s the way everybody feels deep down.”

 * * *

In Michigan, the 2000s are known as “The Lost Decade.” The Rust Belt was the site of the nation’s first Great Recession, in the early 1980s. The First was deeper than the Second — in 1982, Michigan’s unemployment rate was 14.3 percent, a figure not even 2009 could touch — but it was briefer, and it did not result in a permanent diminution of Michiganders’ standard of living. Michigan was the only state to lose population in the 2000s. In 2000, Michigan’s per capita income was 18th among states. By 2009, it was 37th. The poverty rate, once fifth lowest, was 14.4 percent — in the Top 20. Even the obesity rate ballooned to 31.5 percent, putting Michigan among the five fattest states, in the same league of avoirdupois as Alabama and West Virginia. In college degrees, Michigan fell from 30th to 35th, as half the graduates left the state in search of work, like Okies with B.A.s and B.S.s, reversing the migration from the South that had built it into a Megastate of the mid-20th century. (By the early 21st, Michigan would be surpassed by Georgia and North Carolina.) “There’s nothing for them here,” explained a retired Oldsmobile engineer whose children had dispersed to Colorado and California. The unemployment, the low education rate, and the fissured, potholes roads inspired Michiganders to nickname their state “Michissippi.” It may be even more backwards, as racial resentments dating back to the 1960s prevent black Detroit and its white-flight suburbs from acknowledging Michigan can no longer afford so many municipalities. That’s one reason Michigan’s cities are more decrepit and more destitute than any other state’s. Benton Harbor, Pontiac and Flint are so broke their operations have been taken over by emergency financial managers, appointed by the governor. Detroit is to urban blight what Paris is to romance. In Lansing, the shopping center where my family once shopped for groceries, graduation clothes, haircuts, birthday cakes and garden tools is now anchored by a Laundromat, a Food for Less, a dollar store and a plasma center—our very own PoorMart, where a few faded Oldsmobiles and pickup trucks with “$500/OBO” signs float on a lake of asphalt.

Excerpted from “Nothin’ But Blue Skies: The Heyday, Hard Times and Hopes of America’s Industrial Heartland” by Edward McClelland. Published by Bloomsbury. Copyright 2013 Edward McClelland. Reprinted with permission of the author.