Protesters mobilize at Freedom Plaza. Credit: Greg Kaufmann.
Gisele Mata of Whittier, California, never considered herself a
political activist. Other than making some calls on behalf of President
Obama during the 2012 campaign, her focus was on her work, family,
church and volunteering as a Girl Scout troop leader.
But on Monday morning at Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC, she was
ready to march to the Department of Justice, where she would risk arrest
in order to save her family’s home and stand up for other people facing
foreclosure.
“Banks are doing extreme things to get people out of their homes, so
it requires extreme action,” Mata told me. “I wouldn’t be here except
the banks are not being monitored so we have to stand up as citizens.
They are getting away with acts of inhuman behavior and the Justice
Department is not reacting.”
Mata was among 500 activists from across the country who came to the
nation’s capital to “Bring Justice to Justice”—participating in three
days of action organized by
Home Defenders League and
Occupy Our Homes.
They were calling for the criminal prosecution of banks for ongoing
illegal activity, including illegal foreclosures; and for resetting
mortgages to a property’s fair market value for the
more than 13 million homeowners still at risk of foreclosure.
Mata and her family have been in their home for more than ten years.
Their struggle began in 2009 when she and her husband were laid off from
their jobs in retail and engineering, respectively. They survived by
cashing out on their 401(k)s and working in low-wage jobs.
“We didn’t have any problems until last year,” she said, when they no
longer could afford both their home and food for their family of five.
So Mata and her husband requested a mortgage modification from Bank of
America.
“We asked them to tack on what we owed to the principal, and to give
us the going interest rate because we still have a high rate,” she said.
“We aren’t even asking for a principal reduction. Plus we’re both
working, we have equity in our home—but they still refuse.”
Her eldest daughter is now working as a massage therapist. Her
husband is again employed as an aircraft parts quality inspector—for $13
an hour, compared to the $19 hourly wage he previously earned—and Mata
earns commissions as a sales representative for an energy company. But
the high interest payments they are paying force them to choose between a
roof over their head or food for the family.
“Right now we’re choosing the roof and getting food from our church
in order to make payments on the mortgage,” she said. “And we go to the
99 cent store and buy Top Ramen [noodles] and tuna fish. That’s pretty
much how we make it.”
But even as the Matas continue to make their payments,
Bank of America
continues to push for foreclosure. Her dealings with the bank in an
effort to get a modification tell a story that is now all too familiar
in this country.
“Negotiating means paperwork multiple times over and over again,” she
said. “As soon as you get it in they switch your point-of-contact and
then you have to start over again. And as many times as they ask is how
many times you do it, or else they won’t consider you for the
modification. No one is holding them accountable.”
Ann Haines of St. Paul, Minnesota, was also ready to get arrested
after experiencing an even more extreme nightmare in dealing with
US Bank.
She had lived in her home with her three sons for thirteen years, and
was struggling to meet a monthly mortgage payment that had risen from
$800 to $1300.
“I work in intake at a methadone program,” she said. “I see people at
their lowest and my nature is to help. So I was foolishly thinking that
by asking the bank for help I would get it.”
Instead, what she got was US Bank telling her to stop making payments
for three months so she would be eligible for a modification, followed
by the bank sending her the wrong modification application. She then
arrived home one day to find her locks changed and a realtor going out
her back door. The bank proceeded with a sheriff’s sale.
“It was terrifying and you don’t know what to do,” said Haines.
Legal Aid was able to stop the sale of her home, since the bank
admitted it had sent her the wrong modification application and
foreclosed while she was still in underwriting—a process known as “dual
tracking.” (This is now barred under the California Homeowners’ Bill of
Rights and the just-passed
Minnesota Homeowners’ Bill of Rights.)
“But what really inspired me to fight was the attorney for US Bank
sitting across from me in court and saying, ‘The only negotiation US
Bank is willing to do right now is to get her out,’ ” said Haines. “He
didn’t have enough courage to look at me, but he said it.”
Haines hooked up with
Occupy Homes MN and traveled last month to the US Bank shareholders meeting in
Boise, Idaho, to confront CEO Richard Davis.
“Two days later the eviction case was magically closed,” said Haines.
She described herself as “elated” that she no longer fears losing her
home at any moment. But she still felt the need to be in Washington,
DC, to support other struggling homeowners.
“I don’t want to be arrested, jail is scary for me,” she said. “But
I’m willing to do it to show that this is serious. There are too many
people going through this, and the banks have to be held accountable. If
I did something wrong they would hold me accountable.”
Cammy Dupuy of Gonzales, Louisiana, isn’t affiliated with any
particular group—she had learned about the action in recent weeks on the
Internet. She was also prepared for arrest, though not particularly
looking forward to it.
“I’m really nervous and scared to go to jail,” said Dupuy. “But if
that’s what it takes to let people know they’re not alone—the shame
shouldn’t be put on people.”
Since 2006, Dupuy’s mortgage has had so many different banks and loan
servicers attached to it that the trail is dizzying. As a result, she
has had her paperwork lost as servicers change, not been provided new
mailing addresses for payments, fought off two sheriff’s sales and even
received modification “offers” that would have had her paying
double-digit interest rates and waiving her right to sue for the
mishandling of her note.
Throughout her struggle, Dupuy has found herself alone.
“The thing about Louisiana, nobody talks about foreclosures, and they
don’t put signs out in people’s yards like in other states, so they
really keep it from the public,” she said. “But I’ve been pulling up the
sales on my local sheriff’s website and every month there are quite a
bit just in my parish alone.”
Dupuy said a lot of people are “just walking away because they don’t know what to do.”
“I’m tired of feeling alone. I want people in Louisiana to start
talking about it, start standing up, start doing something,” said Dupuy.
“The people in Louisiana fear the law. But if all of us come together
and take a stand then fear shouldn’t be a problem.”
By the end of the day on Monday, Mata was arrested on the steps of
the Department of Justice along with sixteen other nonviolent activists.
(The nonviolence by activists didn’t translate to nonviolent arrests by
Homeland Security officers, who used
tasers.)
The demonstrators had set up an encampment and also blocked traffic
along a very busy Constitution Avenue. Mata and others didn’t give their
names when booked—they didn’t want this to be just another routine
booking and quick release—so she was held until Tuesday evening.
“I told them I was [Bank of America CEO] Brian Moynihan,” said Mata,
and many of the other demonstrators who were arrested used the names of
bank CEOs as well.
Dupuy was arrested along with six other homeowners Wednesday morning
while blocking the lobby entrance to Covington & Burling—a prominent
international law firm that has represented JP Morgan Chase, Bank of
America, UBS and other major banks. Haines was one of the demonstrators
blocking the entrance too, but because she was on the outside of the
building, police just removed her from the space.
In addition to representing the large banks, organizers said the law
firm epitomizes the “revolving door” between serving government and
serving Wall Street’s interests, noting that Attorney General Eric
Holder was a partner at Covington & Burling before coming to the
DOJ, and former Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer left his post in
March to become vice chair of the firm.
For three straight days, these homeowners and their supporters—mostly
low-income people of color—demonstrated what it means to personally
sacrifice for the good of others, to move beyond hopeful words to deeds
and actions.
I hope that those of us who seek change feel their urgency, and will follow their lead to take more and greater action—together.
Victories in Minnesota: Progressive Budget and Homeowners Bill of Rights
According to Carol Nieters, executive director of SEIU Local 284, in
1971, Minnesota Governor Wendell Anderson called education equity—poor
school districts that were struggling—and high property taxes “the issue
of our time.”
The state legislature responded by creating a “general education
levy” that equalized and created dedicated funding for schools, and also
lowered property taxes.
“It went forward like that for like the next four decades,” said
Nieters. “It put Minnesota in a place to be a premier state in
education.”
But then along came Governor Jesse “The Body” Ventura who
body-slammed the levy, and Governor Tim Pawlenty who presided over
nearly a decade of disinvestment from schools and taking from school
appropriations to plug other holes in the budget.
“As a result, we’ve now got ten or eleven four-day school districts,
and other than core curriculum, everything else is cut out—arts, music,
in some cases languages,” said Nieters.
But this week the state reaffirmed its commitment to education. At a
time when so many states are opting to close schools that primarily
serve low-income students, Minnesota passed a budget that closes
corporate tax loopholes and increases education funding and equity.
The 2013 budget erases the state’s $627 million budget deficit,
raises the income tax by 2 percent on the wealthiest 2 percent of
Minnesotans, raises $424 million by closing corporate tax loopholes and
reduces property taxes by $400 million.
The budget uses new revenues to make key investments in education,
including: fully funding optional, all-day kindergarten; increasing
special education funding by $236 million; and importantly, passing
two levies that will make funding for
all school districts more reliable, while also providing additional resources to local districts with the greatest need.
“This budget gets to equity in education
and reduces property taxes,” said Nieters. “Over four decades later we are doing the same thing we did right in 1971.”
She said the budget was achieved by the union and its progressive
allies reaching out to groups all across the state that were pursuing a
“common interest of stronger communities [through] an educated society
and workforce.” They began organizing prior to the 2012 election with a
message that wealthy individuals and corporations must pay their fair
share in order to strengthen education. Many Democrats ran on that
platform, and the party picked up enough seats to win majorities in both
the House and Senate.
After the election, the grassroots coalition kept the pressure on the
newly elected legislators to follow through on their commitments. In
the last few months alone, there were thousands of calls, visits,
letters and e-mails to representatives, and a “Students’ Day” for
parents and children at the Capitol, with students from kindergarten
through high school attending.
The budget was passed Monday night by the legislature, and Democratic Governor Mark Dayton signed it into law yesterday.
“We engaged organizations all over the state—and we can make a
difference if we do that,” said Nieters. “The voice of the people can be
heard over the folks with the money. But you gotta get out there.”
* * *
On Sunday, the Minnesota House of Representatives passed the
Homeowners’ Bill of Rights by a bipartisan 123-0 vote. The Senate passed a companion bill last week, so now it just awaits Governor Dayton’s signature.
The bill protects homeowners through a number of provisions,
including: requiring loan servicers to offer modifications to all
eligible homeowners; banning “dual tracking,” which occurs when a bank
forecloses on a homeowner before communicating a decision on a loan
modification application; and allowing homeowners to take the servicer
to court to stop foreclosure if the servicer fails to comply with any
aspect of the Homeowners’ Bill of Rights. (Also important, lawyer’s fees
and court costs would be covered if the homeowner proves his or her
case.)
Ann Haines, the homeowner from St. Paul interviewed in the DOJ story
above, testified along with other homeowners at a House hearing on the
bill in January.
Democrats and the Farm Bill
I always expect the worst from the House Republicans when it comes to
SNAP (food stamps) and the Farm Bill. So while much attention and anger
has been focused on the
$20.5 billion cut
proposed by the House Agriculture Committee—which would take food
stamps away from nearly 2 million people and result in several hundred
thousand low-income children no longer receiving free school meals—my
reaction was more along the lines of… yeah, what did you expect?
I was actually more disturbed that the Democratic Senate Agriculture
Committee would vote for a $4.1 billion cut in food stamps—even though
the average benefit is about
$1.46 per person, per meal, and a recent Institute of Medicine
report demonstrates that benefit levels are already too low to stave off hunger. The cut “would mean
$90 less a month for 500,000 families already struggling to make ends meet,” according to
Joel Berg,
executive director of the New York City Coalition Against Hunger. Berg
noted that an amendment by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand would have
prevented the SNAP cuts “by instead cutting subsidies for crop insurance
companies, many of which are foreign owned.”
Unfortunately, the committee failed to pass Senator Gillibrand’s
amendment, and Senate Democrats proved yet again that the party’s
commitment to those who are the most economically vulnerable is about as
thin as Republican cut proposals are deep.
But the party outdid itself on Wednesday when the Farm Bill was
debated on the Senate floor. As Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
president Robert Greenstein
describes:
Senator David Vitter offered—and Senate Democrats
accepted—an amendment that would increase hardship and will likely have
strongly racially discriminatory effects. [It] would bar from SNAP, for
life, anyone who was ever convicted of one of a specified list of
violent crimes at any time—even if they committed the crime decades ago
in their youth and have served their sentence, paid their debt to
society, and been a good citizen ever since…. The amendment would [also]
mean lower SNAP benefits for their children and other family members.
So, a young man who was convicted of a single crime at age 19 who then
reforms and is now elderly, poor, and raising grandchildren would be
thrown off SNAP, and his grandchildren’s benefits would be cut…. Senator
Vitter hawked his amendment as one to prevent murderers and rapists
from getting food stamps. Democrats accepted it without trying to modify
it to address its most ill-considered aspects.
Antipoverty advocates suggest
contacting your senators—particularly
Harry Reid, Debbie Stabenow and Richard Durbin—to tell them that you
oppose this provision. They suggest doing it as soon as possible since
it’s unclear how quickly the Farm Bill will move.
You might also suggest to them that the party check Lost and Found for its spine, too.
But at Least We Have Congresswoman Barbara Lee
Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer introduced
the Half-in-Ten Act of 2013, which would establish the Federal
Interagency Working Group on Reducing Poverty. The working group would
develop and implement a national strategy to reduce poverty by half in
ten years, integrating federal policies on poverty reduction, and also
provide regular progress reports to Congress.
“Our policies and programs addressing poverty have not kept pace with
the growing needs of millions of Americans,” said Congresswoman Lee,
who chairs the new Democratic Whip Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity
and consistently represents the interests of low-income Americans. “It
is time we make the commitment to confront poverty head-on, create
pathways out of poverty and provide opportunities for all.”
I would imagine this bill has about as much a shot at passing the
House as this blog has at becoming Speaker Boehner’s favorite bedtime
reading. Nevertheless, I’m always thankful for Representative Lee—I’m
glad the Democratic whip is supporting her efforts—and it’s always
worthwhile to keep up with her work and listen to what she has to say.
And That Goes for Senator Bernie Sanders, Too
Senator Bernie Sanders, chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on
Primary Health and Aging, introduced legislation yesterday to
reauthorize and strengthen the Older Americans Act, which supports Meals
on Wheels and other critical programs for seniors such as in-home care,
transportation, benefits access, caregiver support, chronic disease
self-management, job training and placement and elder abuse prevention.
“With 10,000 Americans turning 65 every day, our country’s growing
population of seniors includes many who rely on these critical programs
to help them stay in their own homes and communities,” said Sanders,
speaking at an Older Americans Summit.
Funding has not kept pace with the growth in need or numbers, and
recent cuts before the sequester hit have further eroded investments in
key services.
In a letter endorsing Senator Sanders’s bill, National Council on
Aging president and CEO James Firman writes that the legislation “can
empower seniors and improve their health and economic security, bend
downward the long-term entitlements cost curve, and promote greater
program efficiency and coordination.”
The bill would also require the Bureau of Labor Statistics to create a
consumer price index for the elderly that would account for spending on
high-inflation goods and services like healthcare, prescription drugs
and heating homes.
Get Involved
Wendy’s: Join the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ Fair Food Program
Hold Sallie Mae accountable for its role in the student debt crisis
Protect Federal Nutrition Programs and SNAP in the Farm Bill
12 Things You Can Do to Fight Poverty
Events
A Bold Approach to the Jobs Emergency (Tuesday, June 4, 8:30
am – 4
pm,
20 F Street NW Conference Center, Washington, DC) We have a US jobs
emergency. More than 11 million Americans are still out of work, and the
austerity push is only making matters worse. States have been forced to
implement deep cuts to emergency unemployment benefits even though
almost 40 percent of the unemployed have been jobless for more than six
months. Great panels—with great people—on how to create good jobs and
raise labor standards. Among the participants: Dean Baker, Maya Wiley,
Ellen Bravo, Sarah Bloom Raskin, Nona Willis Aronowitz, Dorian Warren,
Annette Bernhardt, Ai-Jen Poo, Gar Alperovitz, Joseph Geevarghese,
Madeline Janis and Deepak Bhargava. Presented by the Roosevelt
Institute.
Register here.
2013 Mississippi on the Potomac Reception (Tuesday, June 4, 6:30
pm – 8:30
pm, AFL-CIO, 815 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC) The event marks the tenth anniversary of the
Mississippi Center for Justice,
a not-for-profit public interest legal organization that works against
the odds to provide legal assistance to some of the most vulnerable and
neglected communities in Mississippi, the poorest state in the country.
For more information about the reception, contact Lauren Welford at
601-709-0859 or
lwelford@mscenterforjustice.org, or
click here to sponsor the event or purchase individual tickets.
Clips and other resources (compiled with James Cersonsky)
“
Why I Am Fasting to Keep Families Together,” Gabriela Abendano
“
Improving How Domestic Workers and Their Employers Settle Disputes,” Sheila Bapat
“
SNAP Rolls: They’re Elevated for a Reason,” Jared Bernstein
“
What You Should Know About the Philly Student Walkout,” James Cersonsky
“
Farmworkers Fight Wendy’s, the ‘Last Holdout’ on Fair Food,” Michelle Chen
“
Top Democrats React to Low-Wage Federal Workers’ Strike,” Mike Elk
“
One Community’s Effort to Take Back its Schools,” Equal Voice News
“
Ongoing Joblessness in Michigan,” Mary Gable and Douglas Hall
“
U.S. Retailers See Big Risk in Safety Plan for Factories in Bangladesh,” Steven Greenhouse
“
Senator Vitter Offers—and Senate Democrats Accept—Stunning Amendment With Racially Tinged Impacts,” Robert Greenstein
“
Poverty Flees to the Suburbs,” Josh Harkinson
“
Young College Graduates: Economic Implications of Unpaid Internships,” Will Kimball
“
‘Obamaphones’: A Case Study in How Race Perverts the Spending Debate,” Jamilah King
“
No Head Start for Jacob,” Yannet Lathrop
“
Though Enrolling More Poor Students, 2-Year Colleges Get Less of Federal Pie,” David Leonhardt
“
Poverty up 20 percent among N.J. children 5 and younger, report says,” Susan K. Livio
“
Family Cap Rule Punishes California Kids,” Ashley Morris
“
Why I Am Moved to End Domestic and All Types of Violence,” Marcia Olivo
“
A Long Cold Summer For Young People Looking For Work,” Isaiah J. Poole
“
Unions Make the Middle Class,” Andrew Satter, Lauren Santa Cruz, and Karla Walter [VIDEO]
“
Doing away with food deserts in the District,” Michael Shank
“
Report: Job training rule for food stamps would trim rolls by half,” Jason Stein
Studies/Briefs (summaries written by James Cersonsky)
“
A State-by-State Snapshot of Poverty Among Seniors,”
Zachary Levinson, Anthony Damico, Juliette Cubanski and Patricia
Neuman. Kaiser Family Foundation. The Census Bureau’s standard poverty
measure is based on food costs, family size and age of family members. A
more recent, supplemental measure covers a range of other
poverty-related factors, including homeowner status, regional
differences in housing prices, tax credits, in-kind benefits and
expenses ranging from income taxes to healthcare. For seniors, half of
whom spent at least 16 percent of income on healthcare in 2009, this
last factor is critical. Under the supplemental measure, this report
finds, the senior poverty rate is higher in every state, at least twice
as high in twelve states and roughly
20 percent in six states
(California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Georgia and New York).
Nationally, the senior poverty rate is 15 percent under the supplemental
measure, compared to 9 percent under the official measure. For incomes
below 200 percent of the poverty level, the percentage of seniors
increases from 34 to 48 percent under the supplemental measure. These
findings, the authors say, weigh critically on Medicare and Social
Security policy.
“
The Economic Security Scorecard: Policy and Security in the States,”
Wider Opportunity for Women. What constitutes economic security? This
report hones in on twenty state-level policy areas covering eighty-five
policies: income and job standards, including minimum wages, state
earned income tax credits, paid sick leave and unemployment insurance;
saving and asset policies, including college savings and retirement
plans; supports including childcare assistance, medical assistance and
property tax relief; and education and workforce training policy. The
report evaluates states according to their performance in each of these
areas. Washington is the only state that receives higher than a C grade
(B-), followed by Vermont and Oregon (C+). Scoring D+, Mississippi,
Alabama and Utah anchor the bottom of the rankings. The report finds
that a state’s budget size, median income and overall fiscal health are
not strongly
related to its economic security score. It finds a stronger
relationship between education levels and security; among the top five
states, an average of 35.1 percent of residents have a bachelor’s
degree, compared to 24.1 percent for the bottom five. Overall, it finds,
most states fall short on job quality standards.
“
The Wall Street Wrecking Ball: What Foreclosures Are Costing Us and Why We Need to Reset Seattle Mortgages,”
United Black Clergy and Washington Community Action Network. Across the
country, and particularly among people of color, homeowners are still
feeling the aftershock of the financial crisis. This report shines a
spotlight on Seattle. A staggering 33.5 percent of Seattle homeowners,
42,411 in total, are underwater on their mortgages. Between 2008 and
2012, 16,515 homes were foreclosed on. The report estimates that if
banks reset these underwater mortgages to fair market value, homeowners
would save an average of $9,253 annually, pumping $392 million into the
local economy and helping to create 5,800 jobs.
Vital Statistics
US poverty (less than $17,916 for a family of three): 46.2 million people, 15.1 percent.
Children in poverty: 16.1 million,
22 percent
of all children, including 39 percent of African-American children and
34 percent of Latino children. Poorest age group in country.
Deep poverty (less than $11,510 for a family of four): 20.4 million
people, 1 in 15 Americans, including more than 15 million women and
children.
People who would have been in poverty if not for Social Security, 2011:
67.6 million (program kept 21.4 million people out of poverty).
People in the US experiencing poverty by age 65:
roughly half.
Gender gap, 2011: Women
34 percent more likely to be poor than men.
Gender gap, 2010: Women
29 percent more likely to be poor than men.
Twice the poverty level (less than $46,042 for a family of four): 106 million people, more than 1 in 3 Americans.
Jobs in the US paying less than $34,000 a year:
50 percent.
Jobs in the US paying below the poverty line for a family of four, less than $23,000 annually:
25 percent.
Poverty-level wages, 2011:
28 percent of workers.
Percentage of individuals and family members in poverty who either worked or lived with a working family member, 2011:
57 percent.
Families receiving cash assistance, 1996:
68 for every 100 families living in poverty.
Families receiving cash assistance, 2010:
27 for every 100 families living in poverty.
Impact of public policy, 2010: without government assistance,
poverty would have been twice as high—nearly 30 percent of population.
Percentage of entitlement benefits going to elderly, disabled, or working households:
over 90 percent.
Number of homeless children in US public schools:
1,065,794.
Annual cost of child poverty nationwide:
$550 billion.
Federal expenditures on home ownership mortgage deductions, 2012:
$131 billion.
Federal funding for low-income housing assistance programs, 2012:
less than $50 billion.
Quote of the Week
“The banks are throwing families out into the streets with no regard and no one is holding them accountable.”
—Gisele Mata, California homeowner, arrested at the Department of Justice
James Cersonsky wrote the “Studies/Briefs” and co-wrote the “Clips and other resources” sections in this blog.
This Week in Poverty posts here on Friday mornings, and again at Moyers & Company. You can e-mail me at WeekInPoverty@me.com and follow me on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment